SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RESEARCH LODGE F&AM



RESPONSE TO "THE LODGE
"

E. Arthur Haglund

Past Grand Master, Grand Lodge of California F&AM

member Southern California Research Lodge

INTRODUCTION

The Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod - published a booklet in 1977, "How to Respond to the Lodge," by Pastor L. James Rongstad. The booklet was written as one in a series requested in 1975 by the Synod "for specialized literature to assist in the evangelization of persons who belong to anti-Christian sects and cults." (1 - Rongstad: How to Respond to the Lodge, pg. 5)

The Synod classifies Freemasonry an anti-Christian sect and cult! Unbelievable and not true! The following pages attempt to shed some Masonic light on the accusations.

"Every one is entirely free to reject and dissent from whatsoever herein may seem to him to be untrue and unsound." From the introduction to "Morals and Dogma" by Albert Pike, this statement applies to these writings, and I assume as well to Rongstad's.

Albert Pike is one Masonic author often quoted, including by Rongstad, as a "Masonic authority." A prolific and complex witer, Pike also borrowed liberally from others. Pike and others have really been 'historical authorities' who speak with the expertise that comes from long study.

It should be emphasized that "Masonic authorities" do not and cannot speak for Freemasonry nor for all Masons. No single person represents Freemasonry, including Pike. The only "official" words are those published by each Masonic Grand Jurisdiction as part of it's Masonic Code and it's ritual or ceremonies, including those of the Masonic Degrees.

I appreciate the many studies and writings of the other Masons whom I liberally quote. My experience in and knowledge of Freemasonry is fairly extensive however I do not, cannot, speak for Freemasonry nor for other Freemasons. I do acknowledge my prejudices regarding Freemasonry as well as my lack of knowledge about the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod.

I am a Christian.

I am a Freemason.

I find no conflict between the two. Perhaps the following will help explain why.

E. A. Haglund, Spokane WA. June 1995.

2

MASONIC CHRISTIANS

My maternal grandfather was active in Masonry. He was the first elected Secretary of his Masonic Lodge in 1908. My father was a Past Master of his Masonic Lodge and Past Eminent Commander of his Knights Templar Commandery. Several uncles and my only brother were also Freemasons.

They were all Christians and active church members. My father and grandfather both served as Elders of the First Presbyterian Church of Havre, Montana. During the 1940s their pastor was Rev. Lyman W. Winkle who has been a Mason for nearly 60 years.

I continued in their footsteps. I am a Presbyterian. I am a Past Master of my Lodge in California where I completed the Masonic degrees. We then belonged to the Lafayette Methodist Church, whose Pastor at the time, Rev. Dr. Sargent J. Wright, wrote me a note congratulating me as a Brother Mason. Sarge later served the Grand Lodge of California as Grand Chaplain during the year of my service (1983-84) as Grand Master of the Grand Lodge, Free and Accepted Masons of California.

I am proud to be a Mason and I am proud of my Masonic heritage. Freemasons are from all walks of life and include many of the founders of our country. Nine known Masons signed the Declaration of Independence, including John Hancock and Ben Franklin. Nine Masons also signed the Articles of Confederation while 13 known Masons signed the Constitution of the United States, including again Ben Franklin, who was elected in 1734 to serve an Grand Master of Masons in Pennsylvania. Three other signers also became Grand Masters: Bedford in Delaware, 1806-09; Blair in Virginia, 1778-1784; Brearly in New Jersey, 1786-1790. (2 - Heaton: Masonic Membership of the Founding Fathers, pgs. 4-7, pg. 74)

President of the Federal Constitution Convention and a signer of the Constitution, George Washington, was later elected President of the United States; the first of 14 Presidents who were Masons. He completed his Masonic Degrees in the Lodge of Fredericksburg, VA., in 1753. (2 - Heaton, pg. 74)

Presidents Andrew Jackson (Tennessee) and Harry Truman (Missouri), share my honor of being a Past Grand Master of Masons in their respective states. Besides Truman, several leaders of government and military during World War II were Freemasons, including President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill.

Approximately one third of the Justices of the United States Supreme Court have been Masons. Two who were Chief Justice also served the Masons of their state as Grand Master; John Marshall, Chief Justice from 1801 to his death in 1835 was Grand Master of Masons in Virginia in 1793. Governor Earl Warren, Chief Justice from 1953-1969, preceded me as Grand Master of Masons in California in 1935.

RESPONSE TO "THE LODGE" 3

In my heart and mind it is inconceivable to me that any of these men, including myself, members of my family, leaders of our country and Masons of all professions, including ministers and church leaders, would ever belong to an organization with anti-Christian teachings or belong to a cult of any kind. Yet the Synod considers Masonry an 'anti-Christian sect' by concluding that "the lodge is a religion -- a Christless religion -- and thus a cult, a cult totally incompatible with Christianity and to be avoided by every Christian." (1 - Rongstad pg. 24)

FREEMASONRY A RELIGION?

One of many conclusions in the booklet is this: "Masonry's attitude of condescension toward specific religions is really an elevation of the lodge as a "super-religion." (1 - Rongstad pg. 12)

Freemasons know better. So does the court of law. The Supreme Court of Nebraska, for example, in deciding a case some years ago, used the following illuminating language:

"The guiding thought is not religion but religious toleration .... The Masonic fraternity refrains from intruding into the field of religion and confines itself to the teaching of morality and duty to one's fellow men, which makes better men and better citizens.

"The distinction is clear between such ethical teachings and the doctrines of religion. One cannot espouse a religion without belief and faith in its peculiar doctrines. A fraternity broad enough to take in and cover with its mantle Christian, Moslem and Jew, without requiring him to renounce his religion, is not a religious organization, although its members may join in prayer which, in the case of each, is a petition addressed to his own Deity. Neither can the belief in the immortality of the soul be denominated religious in the sense that it is typical of any religion, of any race, or of any age. It constitutes one of the most beautiful and consoling features of our own religion, but it is equally found in almost every other. It is so unusual and spontaneous that it is not so much belief or dogma as it is an instinct of the human soul. Neither does it imply or require adherence to any system of religious worship.

"The fact that belief in the doctrines or deity of no particular religion is required, of itself refutes the theory that the Masonic ritual embodies a religion, or that its teachings are religious." (3 - Cerza; Let There Be Light, pg. 42)

Perhaps as important as a court of law is the opinion of a knowledgeable church leader and Masonic leader. "We (Masonry) have none of the marks of a religion. We have no creed, and no confession of faith in a doctrinal statement. We have no theology. We have no ritual of worship."

These words are by Past Grand Master of Masons, Rev. Dr. Thomas S. Roy. He was ordained in the United Baptist Church, serving several pastorates until his retirement in 1951 to become Grand Master in Massachusetts. (4 -Roy; An Answer to Anti-Masonic Religious Comments,

4

Scottish Rite Journal, February 1993, pg. 70)

Roy continued: "Our purpose is not that of a religion. We are not primarily interested in the redemption of man. We seek no converts. We solicit no new members. We raise no money for religious purposes. Freemasonry does not assert and does not teach that one religion is as good as another. We do not say that all religiouns are equal because we admit men of all religions. We refuse to apply a theological test to a candidate. We apply a religious test only. We ask a man if he believes in God and that is a religious test only." (4 - Roy pg. 71)

Another inappropriate conclusion by the Synod: "It is our claim that to avoid the revealed Scriptural names for God is a deliberate attempt to deceive by reducing Christianity to just another of the religions of the world." (1 - Rongstad, pg. 24)

"When Freemasonry accepts a Christian, or a Jew or a Buddhist, or a Mohammedan, it does not accept him as such, but as a man, worthy to be received into the Order. We ask him to pledge himself to the highest and holiest loyalty in his life to be true to his vows. To ask him to vow on a book in which he did not believe would be the kind of hypocrisy condemned by the highest teachings of the Christian religion.

"To say that we reject Christ because we do not mention him would be as reasonable as to say that we reject the prophecies of Isaiah because we do not mention them. It is the glory of Masonry that a man who believes implicitly in the deity of Christ, and a man who says he cannot go that far, can meet as brothers in their acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the Supreme Being, the Maker of Heaven and earth, and in acknowledgement of their duty to love Him with heart and mind and soul and strength." (4 - Roy, pg 72)

WHAT IS FREEMASONRY?

Let's begin at the beginning with the Ritual of the First Degree. The "charge" given the new Mason at the conclusion of his First Degree includes: "It (Freemasonry) is an institution having for its foundation the practice of the social and moral virtues; and, to so high an eminence has its credit been advanced, that, in every age and country, men preeminent for their moral and intellectual attainments have encouraged and promoted its interests. Nor has it been thought derogatory to their dignity that monarchs have, for a season, exchanged the sceptor for the trowel, to patronize our mysteries and join in our assemblies. (5 - Monitor & Officers Manual, Grand Lodge of California pg. 15)

Mere words? Swedish King Karl XVI Gustaf if a Freemason and H.R.H. Prince Bertil is Grand Master of Sweden. It was my pleasure to meet these brother Masons in 1984. I am also proud of my Swedish heritage (my father's birthplace).

(To be continued)

RESPONSE TO "THE LODGE" 5

In the Masonic ritual of the Entered Apprentice Degree, the new candidate is informed that "Every regular Lodge is furnished with a Holy Bible, square and Compass. The Holy Bible is dedicated to God, it being his inestimable gift to man as the rule and guide of his faith..... (5 - Monitor, pg. 7)

The charge continues: "As a Mason, you are to regard the Volume of the Sacred Law as the great light in your profession; to consider it as the unerring standard of truth and justice; and to regulate your actions by the divine precepts it contains. In it you will learn the important duties which you owe to God, your neighbor, and yourself. To God, by never mentioning His name but with that awe and reverence which are due from the creature to his Creator; by imploring His aid in all your lawful undertakings; and by looking up to Him in every emergency for comfort and support....." (5 - Monitor pg. 16)

Being a Christian, I consider the Holy Bible as the rule and guide of my faith. As a Mason I am continually reminded to refer to the Holy Bible as my 'great book of insruction.' On this point, Rongstad and I agree for in his introduction, he refers to "the authority of the Bible to determine our moral values, our life principles, goals and priorities; yes our very salvation." (1 - Rongstad pg. 8)

"It is the glory of Masonry that a man who believes implicitly in the deity of Christ, and a man who says that he cannot go that far, can meet as Brothers in their acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the Supreme Being ... they can unite in fulfilling the great purpose of Freemasonry, the development of human character, and the establishment of the colleective life of mankind in brotherhood. In doing this, we dare to hope that we are more than neutral in helping the church in its great task." (4 - Roy, pg. 72)

MASONIC HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION

The Synod booklet states that "organizationally lodgery began with modern Freemasonry in 1717 AD stimulated by two clergymen." True, four London Masonic Lodges formed the first Grand Lodge in 1717. It is also true that two ministers were involved but there is no proof that either man "stimulated" nor "inspired" that action, as contended by Rongstad. Furthermore, it is a fact that speculative Freemasonry pre-dates 1717.

The Premier Grand Lodge of England was instituted on June 24, 1717. "The learned but undisciplined Presbyterian Clergyman, the Reverend James Anderson, late Grand Warden, in 1723, with the approval of that Grand Lodge, published the most influential work on Masonry ever printed, the first book of 'The Constitutions of the Free-Masons.' These included the charges of a Free-Mason extracted from the ancient records of Lodges 'beyond the sea and of those in England, Scotland and Ireland', for the use of the Lodges in London. Apart from a dozen or so tiny changes, the modern wording is identical." (6 - McLeod; The Old Charles, pg. 3)

6

Careful research seems to show that the shift from operative to speculative lodges began in Scotland before the 1700s. In fact, the first record of the admission of a non-operative Mason in a Lodge of Scotland was the year 1600 and the early records of the Lodge in Aberdeen in 1670 showed that some members at that time were operative and others speculative. By 1730 the practice of accepting speculative Masons to Masonic ranks had spread throughout Great Britain with London becoming the center of its headquarters. (7 - Barnardi; Attacks on Freemasonry, The Philalethes magazine, pg. 69)

Much is written and speculation abounds concerning the beginnings of Freemasonry, including the time of building King Solomon's Temple. Contrary to the conclusion of Rongstad, Masons are not taught their origin is traceable to King Solomon. "The story of the operative masons at the time of King Solomon and the building of the Lord's Temple form a valuable part of Masonic ethical and moral teachings, but also cannot be factually proven as the origin of our craft." (7 - Barnard, pg. 69)

The name "Free and Accepted Masons" or "Ancient, Free and Accepted Masons" is used throughout all Masonic Grand Lodges in the world. The term "Freemason" goes as far back as the 14th century and probably referred at that time to an artisan who worked in 'free-stone.'

The booklet "Masonic Parallels with History" by Alphonse Cerza reveals many historical facts. (8) For example, the word "Freemason" appeared for the first time in the Statutes of England, dated 1487 and the term "Master Mason" appeared after the name of William Orchard of Magdalen College in 1479.

Records show that although speculative Lodges existed prior to 1700, the Grand Lodge of Scotland was not formed until 1736. The Grand Lodge of Ireland was formed in 1725, the same year a Lodge was known to exist in Paris; another Lodge in Paris was formed in 1732 under the English Constitution. In 1733 a Lodge was formed in both Sweden and Germany, whose Grand Lodge formed in 1741. (8 - Cerza, pg. 33-37)

FREEMASONRY IN NORTH AMERICA

Freemasonry first came officially to North America when the Grand Lodge of England, on July 5, 1730, issued a deputation to Daniel Cox to act as "Provincial Grand Master of the Provinces of New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania in America." Later that same year the Pennsylvania Gazette, published by Benjamin Franklin, mentioned several Lodges meeting in Philadelphia. Franklin published the first Masonic book in America in 1734, a reprint of Anderson's 'Book of Constitutions.' (8 - Cerza, pg. 35)

The first Lodge was formed in Canada in 1749, the same year Ben Franklin was appointed Provincial Grand Master of Pennsylvania. (8 - Cerza, pg 49) There are currently 51 Masonic Grand Jurisdictions in the United States and 9 in Canada. Often a country has but one Grand Lodge. Such is usually the case in Europe and most of Central and South America.

RESPONSE TO "THE LODGE" 7

The Synod booklet concludes "The lodge, be it local or regional, is not democratically governed. Rather, rule is autocratic." (1 - Rongstad, pg. 14) Perhaps that is a valid conclusion yet the Master is bound to govern with moderation and with due regard so that peace and harmony prevails within the Lodge. He must not only know and observe the Lodge by-laws and constitution, but he should be familiar with the general rules of parliamentary law, constantly having in mind his obligation to "strictly obey the moral law."

The Master is elected annually by his Brethren and is to govern "by diligent observance of the By-Laws of the Lodge, the Constitution of Freemasonry and above all, the Holy Scriptures, which are given as the rule and guide of your faith." (emphasis added) From the Installation Service, adopted by he Grand Lodge of California, F&AM, 1946, page 26.

A Masonic Code containing the Constitutions and Ordinances is published by each Masonic Grand Jurisdiction. All the laws, rules and regulations contained therein have been adopted by vote in a Grand Lodge session. For California, for example, in most cases by a 5/6's majority. A Grand Master's decisions are also subject to a confirming vote by the Grand Lodge.

The California Masonic Code contains 217 pages plus an index. Article II states: "The Jurisdiction of Grand Lodge includes all Lodges and Masons in the state..." "Grand Lodge is the supreme Masonic power and authority in this Jurisdiction and is vested with all legislative, executive and judicial powers, limited only by a strict adherence to the Ancient Landmarks, and by provisions of its own Constitution and Ordinances.

"Any Master Mason who is a member of a constituent Lodge in this Grand Lodge or any other Grand Lodge recognized by this Grand Lodge may be present during an Annual, Special or Ceremonial Communication." Advance notice as to all matters to be voted upon (except those voted on as emergent) is required. There is one vote for each Grand Officer, elected Past Grand Officers, each of the three principal officers of each chartered Lodge along with one collective vote of all Past Masters of each Lodge.

The Code spells out in detail the means of Lodge funding, property ownership, membership and duties of officers. The powers and duties of each Lodge officer are clearly specified. The Master is elected by his Lodge members for a one year term, as are the two Wardens, Treasurer and Secretary. All other officers are appointed.

Moral and physical qualifications for membership are specified, including a man must be of the age of 21 (which now may vary by state down to 18), believe in a Supreme Being and a future existence, be of good moral conduct and without physical or mental impairment that would prevent the applicant from learning and practicing the principles of Masonry or which would create a burden on the Lodge, which question is determined by the Lodge.

Race or religion is not a condition, only belief in a Supreme Being. Question #12 in the "Application for Degrees," "Do you believe in God and a future existence." must be answered in 8

the affirmative.

All applications for degrees are referred to a committee of three composing an investigating committee. Their duty is to make strict examination into the moral, mental, physical and other proper qualifications of the applicant. Following their report, the application is voted upon and must receive a unanimous vote.

Rongstad mistakenly concludes that "favoritism is often practiced in employment, letting of contracts, business deals, and other functions in society. Likewise when someone has left the lodge recriminations are sometimes taken if possible with that person's job, station in life, position in a company, etc." (1 - Rongstad pg. 22)

To the contrary, the 'Application for Degrees' also states: "It cannot be too strongly emphasized that Freemasonry is not be be entered in the hope of personal gain or advancement. Admission must not be sought from mercenary or other unworthy motives." If it appears that Masons are patronizing one another it is likely because it is natural for people who know each other, or have mutual interests, to deal with each other.

There are members who withdraw their membership; this is their right under the Masonic Code: "A member in good standing may withdraw at any time." Rongstad's assertion that "consequences of leaving the Lodge may have life-long significance" (1 - Rongstad pg. 8) may be true to the extent that this withdrawal does not release the man from his solemn promises. Not promises to Freemasonry but those to his fellow-man and his God, which are positive, not negative consequences.

Rongstad's accusation that "recriminations are taken" is absurd. Masons are good men; men of character, with charity and concern for others. "Vindictiveness or recrimination" are neither taught nor practiced. Instead, Masons are taught to practice the domestic and public virtues; Temperance, Fortitude, Prudence and Justice. The three principal tenets of Masonry are Brotherly Love, Relief and Truth.

MASONIC RITUAL AND SECRECY

The Masonic candidate is assured prior to the conferring of the First Degree that his Masonic obligations will not interfere with his duty to God, his neighbor or himself, but appertain to Freemasonry alone.

The obligations taken by every Mason as he progresses through the degrees, are his solemn pledge whereby he is bound to perform certain duties to his family, his lodge, his country and his fellowman. "The sincerity of the new member is attested by the appeal to God, characterizing it as an oath. Yet, the taking of this pledge also brings about certain duties which the lodge and other Masons owe to the new member. The fact that so many others are involved in the ceremony makes it an "obligation." (3 - Cerza, pg. 45)

RESPONSE TO "THE LODGE" 9

Rongstad quotes a play "A Man for All Seasons," and suggests that "As Christians, we need to be reminded of the seriousness of oathtaking and with whom the oath is taken -- refer to 1 Cor. 3:16-17; 6:19-20." (1 - Rongstad, pg. 26)

"That oaths are permissible to Christians is shown by the example of Our Lord (Mat. 26:63) and of Paul (II Cor. l:23' Gal 1:20) and even God Himself (Heb. 6:13-18)"; from 'The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia' (1949) Vol. 4, pg. 2173.

Masonic obligations are serious; furthermore they do not conflict with any moral or legal duty and are a benficial influence in the community.

"No man ever took the oaths and subscribed to the obligations with greater watchfulness and care than I exercised in receiving the various rites of Masonry, and I say with due deliberation and without fear of breaking the faith. I have never encountered a lesson, never witnessed an example, never heard an obligation uttered which could not be openly proclaimed to the world." The words of a Mason who was also a President of the United States, Warren G. Harding.

Rongstad concludes that "Secrecy so dominates the lodge that the candidate, before he knows what he is getting into, must take his oath under the most severe penalties." (1 - Rongstad, pg. 12 and 26.) The penalties in Masonic ritual, described by Rongstad, are clearly symbolic. However, true penalties do exist.

The code published by each Masonic Jurisdiction discloses the only true penalties that could be imposed on any Mason; they are expulsion, suspension, or reprimand. 28 pages, over 10% of the California Masonic Code, contains the definition, application and proper handling of Masonic offenses, including possible restoration. Books on Masonic Law (Code) are open for all to read. They are not secret and are available for examination.

"Another disturbing practice of the lodge," writes Rongstad, "is the emphasis it places on giving aid and defense to a fellow Mason, even if he is guilty of a crime, except in the case of murder and treason." (1 - Rongstad, pg. 21) Rongstad continues: "Can you imagine a defendant, lawyer, judge, and member of a jury, all being Royal Arch Masons, bringing justice to bear in a case?" This accusation suggests that Masons take an oath that is above the law.

The 'Application for Degrees" form, which every man completes to petition a Lodge for membership, includes the following: "Loyalty to one's country is an essential qualification in Freemasonry, and only those are acceptable who cheerfully render obedience to every lawful authority. Disloyalty in any form is abhorrent to a Freemason, and is regarded as a serious Masonic offense."

The commission of a crime is cause for expulsion and is clearly spelled out in the Masonic Code of every Masonic Grand Jurisdiction. It is also consistent with Masonic ritual. From the Ritual of the First Degree: "As a Citizen, you are enjoined to be exemplary in the discharge of your civil

10

duties, by never proposing or countenancing any act which may have a tendency to subvert the peace and good order of society; by paying due obedience to the laws under whose protection you live; and by never losing sight of the allegiance due to your country." (5 - Monitor, pg. 17)

The Supreme Court of Wyoming had this specific point before it for decision. The Court in its opinion said: "however binding an obligation may be, as between members of the same society, secret or otherwise, not to divulge to others that which may be confidentially communicated to them, such an obligation must be understood to be subject to the laws of the country, and doubtless the societies themselves recognize that such a limitation attaches to the obligation; and therefore it cannot be said that the obligation is violated when the disclosure is compelled in a court of justice, in the course of administration of the laws." (3 - Cerza, pg. 47)

Masons know that the obligation they have taken is a good one, that it does not conflict with any moral or legal duty they owe, and that the obligation is a beneficial influence.

Masonic ritual adopted certain lessons or charges, many traced back to versions of the so-called "old charges," written between the 1400s and the early 1700s. One version of ritual was published in 1917 in Scotland; 'The Complete Manual of Freemasonry' by William Harvey, where he writes that "Many Lodges (in Scotland) have characteristic little touches peculiar to themselves. ... I have, however, embodied everything that is essential and that is widely recognized..."

Though many do not publish them, similar ritual versions, only with 'characteristic touches peculiar to themselves,' are used by all Grand Jurisdictions. Harvey's version includes:

"... (and I will) relieve his (Brother Mason's) distress as far as I can do so without serious injury to myself or family.....; that (I) shall be the sacred repository of his (affairs) when entrusted to my care -- murder, treason, felony and all other offences contrary to the laws of God and ordinances of the realm being at all times specially excepted;....." (9 - Harvey; Complete Manual of Freemasonry, pg. 60)

Yes, Masons are asked to aid Brother Masons when possible, and to keep the concerns of a Brother Mason to onesself, when asked to do so. The emphasis is on trust.

"There are some things that I don't remember about that night I took that first step toward a rich and rewarding experience (Masonry) that has enhanced my life. But there are some things that I will never forget. There was a foundation of trust;

--trust in God as the One to whom I could look for support and counsel

--trust in a Brother who could lead me in my blindness to the light of understanding.

I discovered the reality of prayer as the place to begin before undertaking any task." (10 - Gant, "Why I Am A Mason," Freemasonry and Religion pamphlet, pg. 14)

RESPONSE TO "THE LODGE" 11

It is very clear that Freemasonry takes the "moral code" seriously. Prospective Masons are first examined, as previously covered, to assure their moral qualifications. Second, should a Mason violate specifically defined rules of conduct, his actions subject him to a review and possible application of the specific penalties, as discussed above. Such measures help assure each Mason that his trust of fellow Masons, withersoever dispersed throughout the world, is assured.

OTHER MISTAKEN CONCLUSIONS

The Synod booklet devotes several pages to the questions of prayer, the Bible and the "glaring absence of Jesus Christ" in Masonic ritual and prayer. Conclusions reached are often untrue.

For example: "The Lodge does not want to offend anyone. Rather it sees itself as above all religions in the world," (1 - Rongstad, p. 11) Not true. As we've said, Masonry is not a religion nor does Masonry apply any test or judge any religion or church.

He cites two concordant Masonic organizations, the Knights Templar and the Scottish Rite, that refer to Jesus Christ by name in part of their ritual and prayers. "It is a concession granted to those bothered by the Christless prayers prayed in the Blue Lodge." (1 - Rongstad, pg. 21)

This is his conclusion but the fact is, a Master Mason is under no obligation to petition for membership in either of these two concordant organizations. If a "Christian Mason" is concerned by the lack of reference to Jesus Christ or "bothered by the Christless prayers prayed in the Blue Lodge," it is doubtful he would desire to be a member of either concordant group. A "concession" --- I question the logic.

The Synod booklet is laced with other questionable conclusions, even accusations. When referring to a discussion of "contradictions in the teachings of lodgery and Christianity," the Mason "usually retreats into his shell of secrecy. In depth discussion is avoided. Quite possibly he thinks of himself as above sectarian differences and so refuses with politeness to openly talk." (1 - Rongstad pg. 13) And "At a certain point in the conversation the Mason simply 'clams up.' He refuses to talks anymore. There is much he tries to hide because he has been sworn to secrecy." (1 - Rongstad pg. 25)

My knowledge of Freemasonry and personal association with many individual Masons leads me to a completely different conclusion. It is not "sworn secrecy" or "being above sectarian differences" that would cause many Masons to "clam up." Rather, it is perhaps their feeling of inadequacy to properly represent Masonry in an "in depth discussion," particularly with an educated and well trained theologian.

"Every Mason knows that the privacy of the Masonic ceremonies lends dignity to them and make them most impressive. It creates a felling of closer unity among the members for they subconsciously feel that they have something in common with the other members which is not shared by others in the community. This makes for a more unified association.

12

"Secrecy in itself is not bad. It is only the secrecy for unlawful purposes that is harmful. The principles of Masonry are well known, and the work of Masonry is exposed to the world. These are good. Therefore, the fact that Masonry contains some secrets is not a point that can be urged against the Craft." (3 - Cerza, pg. 40)

WITNESSES - FREEMASON MINISTERS

Perhaps Rongstad's conclusions would have changed had he spoken with Masons who were as experienced as he in matters of the Bible, church, Christianity and theology. What follows are a few words by some distinguished Masons who are much more qualified to address many theological issues raised by the Synod.

"Freemasonry is, for all its members, a supplement to good living which has enhanced the lives of millions who have entered its doors. Though it is not a religion, as such, it supplements faith in God the Creator. It is supporting of morality and virtue." (10 - Rev. Dr. Norman Vincent Peale, NY, pg. 22)

"Let me quickly and emphatically say that Freemasonry is not and has never been a religion; Freemasonry has always been a friend and ally of religion. In 50 years as a minister and as a Mason, I have found no conflict between by Masonic beliefs and my Christian faith. I have not found and do not now find that Freemasonry is 'incompatible with Christian faith and practice.'" (10 - Bishop Carl J. Sanders, United Methodist Church, Alabama, pg. 5)

"It is no secret that Masonry is not a religion, nor a church. Masonry respects every man's right to the religion of his choice and never claims or desires to be any man's religion or a substitute for it. For any person to allow Masonry to become his religion or to take the place of his church is a mistake and not due to Masonic teaching but to someone's misinterpretation or misunderstanding." (10 - Dr. James P. Wesberry, Executive Director and Editor of 'Sunday,' a Georgia Baptist Center, pg. 9)

"The question 'Why Are You A Mason?' can be answered. It has allowed me to grow personally ... to serve God ... and to reach out in concern to my fellow human beings. It has supported my personal faith and work as a churchman. Let no one say you cannot be a Christian and a Mason at the same time. I know too many who are both and proud to be both." (10 - Rev. Louis R. Gant, District Superintendent, The United Methodist Church, Kansas, pg. 15)

"In my entire life as a minister, I have never experienced any conflict between my love and devotions to my Lord and His Church and my membership in the Masonic Fraternity. Masonry is not a religion, and it is by no means a substitute for religion." (12 - William M. Suttles, Professor Emeritus and Provost Emeritus, Georgia State University, Atlanta GA, pg. 78)

RESPONSE TO "THE LODGE" 13

As a Christian minister, I believe that Jesus is the Son of God. I also believe that any Lodge prohibiting me from holding that belief or berating me for being a Christian is not a Lodge of 'Brothers' but a stronghold of bigotry. This same belief, however, should hold true in a Lodge of 'Brothers' for a Jewish Mason ..... The teachings of Masonry and the lives you and I live as Jewish and Christian Masons will combine with others of the Fraternity to represent what Masonry is in this century. Our Jewish Brothers will espouse Moses, Abraham and David while Christian Masons will also speak of Saint Paul and Jesus Christ. Together, hopefully, we will exhibit unity and 'Brotherhood' to those who hate on the basis of race, creed, color and religion." (10 - Rev. Dr. W Kenneth Lyons, Maryland, pg. 16)

"I am unashamably a Christian, and as a Christian I am commanded to love all people. If I don't respect other men who have differing faiths, do I truly care for them? Do I truly love as a Christian if I do not have appreciation for others of differing faiths? I have been blessed in Lodge meetings to share the friendship of my Jewish Brothers and others of differing faiths." (11 - Rev. Dr. Gary W. Trail, Gospel Train Evangelistic Ass., MD, Scottish Rite Journal, Sept. 1994, pg. 21)

"All my life I have been a committed Christian and church person. Masonry has always indicated to me that an individual must find and follow his own faith. As a Christian my faith has not been threatened or compromised by Masonry in spite of the anti-Masonic interpretations and explanations of those who could find better causes toward which to devote their time and talent. Masonry does not make a person a good man, but a good Mason is a very good man." (12 - Rev. Dr. Warren C. Hultgren, Pastor Emeritus, First Baptist Church, Tulsa, OK, Scottish Rite Journal, February 1993, pg. 83)

"Freemasonry is not a religion and cannot take the place of religion. But in its acknowledgement of a Supreme Being and the worth of human brotherhood, it has a religious basis and a common meeting ground with all religions." (12 - Rabbi Sidney S. Guthman, Long Beach, CA, pg. 68)

"Masonry is not a religion. It is a fraternity of men who, first of all, must believe in God. It is a religious organization in that it encourages members to support each individual's faith, whether he is a Christian, Muslim, Hebrew or other monotheistic believer. Masonic teachings are based largely on Old and New Testament principles, but also other religious teachings -- all honorable. One of the first instructions given to a new member being received into a Masonic Lodge is that Freemasonry will not interfere with his religious or political opinions. Masonry teaches toleration of other's beliefs. (12 - John E. Johns, PhD, President of Furnam University, Greenville SC, pg. 50)

The fact that these and so many other clergymen of different denominations are Masons and yet find no conflict in carrying on their duties, should be proof enough that Freemasonry is not a religion -- nor anti-Christian -- nor a cult!

14

"No one who does not observe, participate and experience the life and works of the Church or the Lodge will be able to undertand them. Understanding comes not from just talking the talk, but from walking the walk." (12 - Abner V. McCall, President Emeritus, Baylor University, pg. 50)

CONCLUSION

Origins, titles, ceremonies, symbols - they are not the heart of Masonry. "The heart of Masonry is in the hearts of its members. That's what Masonry really is. Its the men in it. No one has to tell me that these men believe God is love." (13 - Robinson; A Pilgrim's Path, pg. 177)

The moral teachings of Freemasonry are in no way opposed to the beliefs of Christianity. It is not possible to find any lesson taught in the ceremonies of Freemasonry that can be called anti-Christian. But it is possible to find good men who believe in God and endeavor to practice the three principal tenets of Masonry: Brotherly Love, Relief and Truth. Quoting from the ritual of the First Degree: (5 - Monitor, pg. 11-12)

Brotherly Love - By the exercise of Brotherly Love we are taught to regard the whole human species as one family, the high and the low, the rich and the poor, who, as created by one Almighty Parent, and inhabitants of the same planet, are to aid, support and protect each other. On this principle Masonry unites men of every country, sect and opinion; and causes true friendship to exist among those who might otherwise have remained at a perpetual distance.

Relief - To relieve the distressed is a duty incumbent to all men, but particularly to Masons, who are linked together by an indissoluble chain of sincere affection. To sooth the unhappy, to sympathize with their misfortunes, to compassionate their miseries, and to restore peace to their troubled minds, is the great aim we have in view. On this basis we form our friendships and establish our connections.

Truth - Truth is a divine attribute and the foundation of every virtue. To be good and true is the first lesson we are taught in Masonry. On this theme we contemplate, and by its dictates endeavor to regulate our conduct. Hence, while influenced by this principle, hypocrisy and deceit are unknown among us; sincerity and plain dealing distinguish us; and with heart and tongue we join in promoting each other's welfare and rejoicing in each other's prosperity.

The benediction given at the close of every Masonic meeting: (5 - Monitor, pg. 49)

"May the blessing of Heaven rest upon us and all regular Masons! May Brotherly Love prevail, and every moral and social virtue cement us! Amen. So mote it be!"

Bishop Sanders (above) wrote: "In a day of mistrust, suspicion, discrimination, separation and even hatred Freemasonry removes the distance between men. Friendship, morality, and brotherly

RESPONSE TO "THE LODGE" 15

love are the hallmarks of our relationships. There is a basic integrity in the Fraternity so often lacking in many of life's relationships." (10 - Sanders, pg. 4)

Perhaps there is a need for better understanding.

REFERENCES

1 - Rongstad, L. James. 'The Lodge.' St. Louis Mo: Concordia Publishing House, 1977.

2- Heaton, Ronald E. 'Masonic Membership of the Founding Fathers.' Silver Spring, MD: The Masonic Service Association, 1988.

3 - Cerza, Alphonse. 'Let There Be Light.' Silver Spring, Md: The Masonic Service Association, 1983.

4 - Roy, Rev. Thomas S. 'An Answer to Anti-Masonic Religious Propoganda.' Abstract of the

Proceedings of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts, 1952. The Scottish Rite Journal, Vol. CI,

No. 2, Feb., 1993.

5 - 'Monitor and Officer's Manual,' Grand Lodge of California, F.&A.M. Revised 1977.

6 - McLeod, Wallace. 'The Old Charges.' Canadian Edition. Toronto: Privately printed, 1986.

7 - Barnard, Robert C. 'Attacks on Freemasonry Truth and Fiction.' The Philalethes Magazine,

Vol XLVII, No. 3, June, 1994.

8 - Cerza, Alphonse. 'Masonic Parallels with History.' Silver Spring, MD: The Masonic Service

Association, 1983.

9 - Harvey, William. 'The Complete Manual of Freemasonry.' Dundee (Scotland): T. M. Sparks,

Croswell Works, 1919.

10 - 'Freemasonry and Religion.' Washington, DC: The Supreme Council, 33, Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, May 1987.

11 - Trail, Rev. Dr. Gary W. 'Why I Am A Mason and a Minister.' The Scottish Rite Journal,

Vol. CII, No. 9, September 1994.

12 - Scottish Rite Journal, Special Issue 'Freemasonry and Religion.' Vol. CI, No. 2, February

1993.

13 - Robinson, John J. 'A Pilgrim's Path.' New York: M. Evans & Co. Inc., 1993.


Return to the Papers Main Page
Return to the SCRL Home Page